Flipping through my Facebook feed today, I was struck by an item posted by my long-ago former-place-of-pseudo employment, SPIN (I interned for the magazine for several payless months in 1989). Here’s the headline that caught my eye:
Punk Legends L7 Will Reunite for Festival Appearances This Summer.
Personally speaking, I really don’t give a damn. As far as I’m concerned, L7 were never much to get too excited about. You, of course, may beg to differ. That’s fine, but let’s get something straight. L7 were never “punk legends.” Both words are woefully misapplied. My ire piqued, I clicked on the link. Here’s the first sentence, which I barely made it through….
After nearly fifteen years of inactivity, '80s Los Angeles punk pioneers L7 have just announced their first reunion performances at festivals...”
“`80s Los Angeles punk pioneers”????
`80s LOS ANGELES PUNK PIONEERS?????
Look, not to get all slavishly pedantic, but L7 didn’t put out their first album until 1990, so let’s cut the “80s” crap from the get-go.
But “punk pioneers”???? PUNK????? PIONEERS??
What the HELL, SPIN? And this isn’t even about me being an insufferable music geek and self-styled knowitall, this is about SIMPLE FACTS. Calling L7 “punk pioneers” is just a goddamn LIE.
Listen, at the end of the day, while they were never my particular cup of tea, there’s nothing wrong with L7. My incredulousness about this piece has little-to-nothing to do with the band. If you want to groove out to them, you go right ahead. Knock your socks off. I’m sure they’re awesome individuals who are slavishly committed to their music. I'm not even going to add a picture of them to this post, because -- quite simply -- this isn't about L7.
Let’s just not call them “punk pioneers,” shall we?
What bothers me is that these statements were asserted under the once-estimable banner of SPIN Magazine. Now, granted, SPIN hasn’t really mattered in a long, long time (and some may question that it ever did). But I’ll say this: As the first mainstream American glossy monthly to endeavor to cover genuinely left-of-the-dial music (to say nothing of their early coverage — largely courtesy of Celia Farber — of the AIDS crisis), SPIN was once a credible force to be reckoned with.
Sure, editor-in-chief Bob Guccione, Jr. was arguably a bit of jerk, but SPIN still dared to cover punk, hardcore, indie and nascent hip-hop while Rolling Stone was still tirelessly putting the same old established warhorses on its covers and between its pages. SPIN employed folks like John Leland, Charles Aaron, Legs McNeil, Pat Blashil, and frequently took bold, fresh approaches to stories. Speaking as a devoted SPIN reader for many years, I never missed an issue (even after I’d seen in the inside of the sausage factory). I may not have always agreed with their editorial declarations (especially Guccione’s tirelsss advocacy of John Cougar Mellencamp), but for the most part, SPIN knew its shit and was much further ahead of the curve than Rolling Stone would ever hope to be.
That’s all ancient history, I guess. But calling L7 “punk pioneers”?
That’s some pretty disappointing, amateurish shit.
Recent Comments